|
|
Post by Me Tom!!!! on Sept 2, 2005 17:05:54 GMT
why do the categories change each wysok tournament, and same for the rules?
|
|
|
|
Post by Liv on Sept 2, 2005 20:57:26 GMT
They don't. The rules change if we change them at a Dan Grade meeting at the beginning of each year, and the categories have been jumping around a bit, but will be the same this time as last time. It was mainly because I have been trying to spilt up the junior categories as fairly as possible, and its been a bit trial and error.
|
|
|
|
Post by Me Tom!!!! on Sept 4, 2005 15:47:23 GMT
so is the age 17 when we move into the adults?
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob™ on Sept 5, 2005 14:09:32 GMT
How come they don't go on height then it would make the competition a bit fairer for some of the smaller competitors...?
|
|
Kate
Spiffing Togs (III)
Posts: 42
|
Post by Kate on Sept 6, 2005 8:14:00 GMT
Here here Rob! Height seem a much fairer way to split them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hannah on Sept 6, 2005 8:29:05 GMT
yeah it would
|
|
Frances
Super Magic Handwraps (VI)
Posts: 289
|
Post by Frances on Sept 6, 2005 15:03:12 GMT
hello sensei.
And why the hight thing i think that would casue a stir.you remeber you get tall when you are a grown up.And you should have the right as well then you grow tall as you get older and i thinkl it should be fair silt them like they are now leave it at seniors with seniors and juniors with juniors.!
|
|
|
|
Post by Me Tom!!!! on Sept 6, 2005 15:06:20 GMT
i think you should be 18 to be classed as an adult at the wysok chapmionships
thats just what i think
|
|
|
|
Post by Liv on Sept 6, 2005 15:47:31 GMT
its 16 currently - we did experiment with a 14-18 yrs section but nobody entered so it was scrapped.
So there! you had your chance to have it and scuppered it. You can't complain.
|
|
Frances
Super Magic Handwraps (VI)
Posts: 289
|
Post by Frances on Sept 6, 2005 18:57:14 GMT
me im not bothered either way about weight or height catagories.i only do kata section and creative section of it.
|
|
-=(( §ez ))=-
Ming Dynasty T-Shirt (VII)
2o_Phillip-Flop_o5
Posts: 535
|
Post by -=(( §ez ))=- on Sept 6, 2005 22:29:21 GMT
Lol.......... no comment
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob™ on Sept 8, 2005 21:04:44 GMT
When I said height Frances I didn't mean combine everyone together! But it would make it fairer for juniors on height and seniors on weight obviously still incorporating low grade, high grade and dan grade in different categories.
|
|
|
|
Post by /\/!c! on Sept 9, 2005 16:56:57 GMT
i no wot u ment rob
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob™ on Sept 9, 2005 17:07:08 GMT
its 16 currently - we did experiment with a 14-18 yrs section but nobody entered so it was scrapped. So there! you had your chance to have it and scuppered it. You can't complain. Tom said 18 should be adult not have 14 year olds fighting them! Would be better having 16-18 category if you're planning to have 18 as adult age then have other categories up to 15 but go on height! |
|
|
|
Post by Liv on Sept 9, 2005 20:33:45 GMT
a 16-18 section would have nooooooooooone in it!
|
|
